Honda City History: From Time to Time

[still W.I.P, need to add pictures]

Honda City, for anybody this side of South East Asia, the City is most synonymous with Honda entry level sedan that caters to the masses. Based on the Fit/Jazz, the City is the logical step for achievers (Enneagram of Personality) as sedans are considered to be a luxury car no matter how big it is… Hey, we live in Asia. Before we plunge further, let me clarify first what is the City and the original car that bears the name.

If you go by the moniker “City”, then the car has reached its fifth generation. But, if you want to trace its true lineage in the South East Asia market, the current generation Honda City only reached its third generation, while the first two generation of Honda City is Japan exclusive.

Dawn of a new age

The first ever car that uses the City name is a spunky 1981 two door hatch. A tall roofline + a boxy design, this is certainly not Soichiro’s Civic. The car was designed with a crack team of young engineers, something that was unheard of back in the days… Seriously? The first City was a cult favorite [citation needed] as its refreshed model features Honda first ever turbo engine with high power to weight ratio. The turbo City is an iconic car with its unique shape and powerful engine, even today, the dinky car is still raced by some odd groups here and there.

The car even featured on “You Are Under Arrest” anime series with its iconic Motocompo trunk bike… Ah the Motocompo, I’ve been wanting it since I was a kid, but thinking that it was anime magic for a bike that small exists (like the cute gals with big boobs on the police force). But it’s real, the 50cc foldable scooter is an accessory to the City and its smaller sibling, the Today… Unfortunately, cute gals with big boobs on the police force still is a dream though.

The second generation Honda City, a true successor of the 1981 City was unveiled 5 years later in 1986… But smell of problem is thick in the air. Honda now had two similar cars, the Civic hatch and the City. It’s no brainer which model should be outed no? With Civic strong brand equity, the City finally got the boot. And that’s that… The City is officially dead.

There’s a reboot in automotive world?

It’s not until some odd 10 years later in 1996, Honda City came back, but had no direct connection with the original Japanese City. The City we are talking now is South East Asia Pacific only model that is based on the EF Civic platform. Rather than a hatchback like two past generations, the City is now a sedan… A no frill entry level sedan.

The first roll out model features carburetor engine which according to Honda research gave the car great (easy) maintenance… Aw come on, we are talking Asians here… Back then fuel injection was all the rage, nobody this side of rice eaters wanted a sensible car, we want status. The City first outing was not met with much success, although it features great suspension setup derived from the Civic platform (double wishbone front and back).

However, it’s not until Honda bestow the legendary D series VTEC engine into the engine bay of the refreshed City and the City Type Z (in some countries) take one up in the history of sub compact sedans. Thanks to the EF Civic platform, the City Type Z features double wishbone suspension front and back which has been rendered useless before the VTEC engine was used. With the VTEC engine, the car came to life like madness itself. The 1.5L VTEC produces 115ps and some even manage to coax 130ps with some slight modification. The car also had great power to weight ratio. With a weight hovering around 950 Kilogram, the high strung engine moves the car effortlessly. Also, Great suspension + great engine = domination… Yup… Wherever there’s a subcompact touring racing back in the late 90’s and early 2000, you will see City Type Z at the top of the chart.

It’s good, let’s make some more

The SE Asia only City (at least the refresh) was very well accepted, and Honda decided to make a second generation out of it. However, Honda remove all traces of spirited driving of the first generation SE Asia City by basing it off the just introduced Honda Fit/Jazz. Gone are the multilink suspension and the high power engine, and in are… The tall cabin, torsion beam suspension and so so engine. The car has high roof line and enormous cabin space; it feels like you’re entering a compact MPV or some sort… It’s based on the Fit/Jazz… what do you expect? The rear seat was multi configurable to accommodate tall objects or protruding objects from the trunk. The initial engine derived from the Fit/Jazz 1.5L i-DSI engine producing a measly 90ps. It got great fuel efficiency, but combined with the increased weight from the past generation City, suffice to say, the City transforms from boy racer to mommy car.

This City addresses problems with smallish cabin space of the past generation City… But Honda did went a bit overboard with its approach. The addition of VTEC engine is a welcome healing patch for the enthusiast, but the car is just not balanced enough like the old City. It’s bad for the enthusiast who the first generation SE Asia City fans have grown accustomed to, but the car is great for the average commuters and family. City’s new tall cabin and multifunction seats made the car perfect for your average families. Got a lot of shopping bags? The huge cavernous trunk was the biggest in its class. Bought that tree from the flower stall across the street? Flip the rear seat and you can fit a tree or two inside. Perfect, perfectly bland.

On a side note, Honda did bring the fourth generation City back to Japan under the name of Fit-Aria, officially bringing the car as part of Fit heritage.

The second generation SE Asia City was great technically, but a lot of people dislike how it looks. The tall looking City is not attractive, especially compared to Toyota own SE Asia subcompact sedan, Vios (Yaris sedan).Technically the City was based off the Fit/Jazz, but slightly too much. Yes, you can look some difference, but the short nose Fit/Jazz also incorporated straight into the City, making the car looking short in the front and long in the rear… A no no for a sedan. To make matter worse, the interior of the City is the same with Fit/Jazz, only with different colors… Want to read an embarrassing story? Well you would because you’re reading this… I used to drive Honda Jazz a couple years back, and my former boss who happens to drive a City asked me to park his car. I almost rear ends the car as the sensation of driving the Jazz and the City is almost the same. Same interior, same seating position… It’s creepy I tell ya.

In Indonesia, Honda City sales were better by a bit compared to the Vios. But elsewhere in SE Asia, you won’t find that many City on the road. Honda even commissions the most expensive minor model change on the City… Making the nose of the car longer, making it look like a sedan, a big fat nosed sedan.

I hear you buddy

Honda though, noted the demand of the enthusiasts and in 2008, launched the third generation Honda City. Guess what, the car was above and beyond the dinky and lanky City it replaced. The new 2009 City is handsome… Simply gorgeous… Or whatever you want to call it. It still is based on the Fit/Jazz, but this time, the car was only based upon the platform, and not structurally. Back then, the City and Fit/Jazz shares almost everything, this time, not so much. Different door design, different side crease, different interior even… Well, you almost can’t tell if the car is even related. Also, thanks to advancement in engineering, Honda introduced class breaking most powerful engine in the segment and 5 gear automatic box on the new City. The City, like the Fit/Jazz now features a 1.5L i-VTEC engine producing a phenomenal 120ps. Like any VTEC engine, the higher the RPM goes, the more enjoyment you find in this car. Still though, the new City is still no match for the third generation VTEC City, as it still retains the best power to weight ratio in the history of City… Considering that the trend cars grows bigger over the time, third generation City is a keeper (the new City weighs in at approximately 1200 Kilogram).

The new City addresses all the perceived fault of the late generation City. Balancing form and function; gaining composure and power, however the new City lost some of its practicality charm, most notable is the exclusion of the multi configurable rear seat. Now, the rear seat doesn’t folds up, just folds down allowing long object to protrude from the trunk. In the defense, Honda claims that past generation Honda City usage research reveals that folding up seat feature was the least used feature. Therefore, the foldable rear seat was omitted to make way for comfier rear support (read: thicker padding).

Honda seems to be satisfied with the City, Honda even finally debut the City as a global car, making it available in parts of Europe, Brazil, China, India and even Australia. A far far far glorious story than the Japanese exclusive beginning and SE Asia specific model midlife.

So, is the City currently in its fifth generation or third generation? It’s up to you really, according to the name, the car is in its fifth generation. But discounting the two generation Japanese only Honda City and with its reboot as the SE Asia specific model, the car only reached its third generation. I guess for name sake we can say the car is in its fifth generation.

All in all, the City is a great car, a bit spotty here and there, but a great car nonetheless. For every generation there’s a fault somewhere, but Honda made it up in every successive generation. The third generation City is too small, but runs like hell. The fourth generation City is bloated but practical. The fifth generation City strikes it dead center. As the pinnacle of research and years of listening to the demand of the customer, it might just be the best Honda City to date, striking between balance, function and power.

http://www.honda.co.jp/HOT/ModelData/city/index.html

Honda City, for anybody this side of South East Asia, the City is most synonymous with Honda entry level sedan that caters to the masses. Based on the Fit/Jazz, the City is the logical step for achievers (Enneagram of Personality) as sedans are considered to be a luxury car no matter how big it is… Hey, we live in Asia. Before we plunge further, let me clarify first what is the City and the original car that bears the name.

If you go by the moniker “City”, then the car has reached its fifth generation. But, if you want to trace its true lineage in the South East Asia market, the current generation Honda City only reached its third generation, while the first two generation of Honda City is Japan exclusive.

Dawn of a new age

The first ever car that uses the City name is a spunky 1981 two door hatch. A tall roofline + a boxy design, this is certainly not Soichiro’s Civic. The car was designed with a crack team of young engineers, something that was unheard of back in the days… Seriously? The first City was a cult favorite [citation needed] as its refreshed model features Honda first ever turbo engine with high power to weight ratio. The turbo City is an iconic car with its unique shape and powerful engine, even today, the dinky car is still raced by some odd groups here and there.

The car even featured on “You Are Under Arrest” anime series with its iconic Motocompo trunk bike… Ah the Motocompo, I’ve been wanting it since I was a kid, but thinking that it was anime magic for a bike that small exists (like the cute gals with big boobs on the police force). But it’s real, the 50cc foldable scooter is an accessory to the City and its smaller sibling, the Today… Unfortunately, cute gals with big boobs on the police force still is a dream though.

The second generation Honda City, a true successor of the 1981 City was unveiled 5 years later in 1986… But smell of problem is thick in the air. Honda now had two similar cars, the Civic hatch and the City. It’s no brainer which model should be outed no? With Civic strong brand equity, the City finally got the boot. And that’s that… The City is officially dead.

There’s a reboot in automotive world?

It’s not until some odd 10 years later in 1996, Honda City came back, but had no direct connection with the original Japanese City. The City we are talking now is South East Asia Pacific only model that is based on the EF Civic platform. Rather than a hatchback like two past generations, the City is now a sedan… A no frill entry level sedan.

The first roll out model features carburetor engine which according to Honda research gave the car great (easy) maintenance… Aw come on, we are talking Asians here… Back then fuel injection was all the rage, nobody this side of rice eaters wanted a sensible car, we want status. The City first outing was not met with much success, although it features great suspension setup derived from the Civic platform (double wishbone front and back).

However, it’s not until Honda bestow the legendary D series VTEC engine into the engine bay of the refreshed City and the City Type Z (in some countries) take one up in the history of sub compact sedans. Thanks to the EF Civic platform, the City Type Z features double wishbone suspension front and back which has been rendered useless before the VTEC engine was used. With the VTEC engine, the car came to life like madness itself. The 1.5L VTEC produces 115ps and some even manage to coax 130ps with some slight modification. The car also had great power to weight ratio. With a weight hovering around 950 Kilogram, the high strung engine moves the car effortlessly. Also, Great suspension + great engine = domination… Yup… Wherever there’s a subcompact touring racing back in the late 90’s and early 2000, you will see City Type Z at the top of the chart.

It’s good, let’s make some more

The SE Asia only City (at least the refresh) was very well accepted, and Honda decided to make a second generation out of it. However, Honda remove all traces of spirited driving of the first generation SE Asia City by basing it off the just introduced Honda Fit/Jazz. Gone are the multilink suspension and the high power engine, and in are… The tall cabin, torsion beam suspension and so so engine. The car has high roof line and enormous cabin space; it feels like you’re entering a compact MPV or some sort… It’s based on the Fit/Jazz… what do you expect? The rear seat was multi configurable to accommodate tall objects or protruding objects from the trunk. The initial engine derived from the Fit/Jazz 1.5L i-DSI engine producing a measly 90ps. It got great fuel efficiency, but combined with the increased weight from the past generation City, suffice to say, the City transforms from boy racer to mommy car.

This City addresses problems with smallish cabin space of the past generation City… But Honda did went a bit overboard with its approach. The addition of VTEC engine is a welcome healing patch for the enthusiast, but the car is just not balanced enough like the old City. It’s bad for the enthusiast who the first generation SE Asia City fans have grown accustomed to, but the car is great for the average commuters and family. City’s new tall cabin and multifunction seats made the car perfect for your average families. Got a lot of shopping bags? The huge cavernous trunk was the biggest in its class. Bought that tree from the flower stall across the street? Flip the rear seat and you can fit a tree or two inside. Perfect, perfectly bland.

The second generation SE Asia City was great technically, but a lot of people dislike how it looks. The tall looking City is not attractive, especially compared to Toyota own SE Asia subcompact sedan, Vios (Yaris sedan).Technically the City was based off the Fit/Jazz, but slightly too much. Yes, you can look some difference, but the short nose Fit/Jazz also incorporated straight into the City, making the car looking short in the front and long in the rear… A no no for a sedan. To make matter worse, the interior of the City is the same with Fit/Jazz, only with different colors… Want to read an embarrassing story? Well you would because you’re reading this… I used to drive Honda Jazz a couple years back, and my former boss who happens to drive a City asked me to park his car. I almost rear ends the car as the sensation of driving the Jazz and the City is almost the same. Same interior, same seating position… It’s creepy I tell ya.

In Indonesia, Honda City sales were better by a bit compared to the Vios. But elsewhere in SE Asia, you won’t find that many City on the road. Honda even commissions the most expensive minor model change on the City… Making the nose of the car longer, making it look like a sedan, a big fat nosed sedan.

I hear you buddy

Honda though, noted the demand of the enthusiasts and in 2008, launched the third generation Honda City. Guess what, the car was above and beyond the dinky and lanky City it replaced. The new 2009 City is handsome… Simply gorgeous… Or whatever you want to call it. It still is based on the Fit/Jazz, but this time, the car was only based upon the platform, and not structurally. Back then, the City and Fit/Jazz shares almost everything, this time, not so much. Different door design, different side crease, different interior even… Well, you almost can’t tell if the car is even related. Also, thanks to advancement in engineering, Honda introduced class breaking most powerful engine in the segment and 5 gear automatic box on the new City. The City, like the Fit/Jazz now features a 1.5L i-VTEC engine producing a phenomenal 120ps. Like any VTEC engine, the higher the RPM goes, the more enjoyment you find in this car. Still though, the new City is still no match for the third generation VTEC City, as it still retains the best power to weight ratio in the history of City… Considering that the trend cars grows bigger over the time, third generation City is a keeper (the new City weighs in at approximately 1200 Kilogram).

The new City addresses all the perceived fault of the late generation City. Balancing form and function; gaining composure and power, however the new City lost some of its practicality charm, most notable is the exclusion of the multi configurable rear seat. Now, the rear seat doesn’t folds up, just folds down allowing long object to protrude from the trunk. In the defense, Honda claims that past generation Honda City usage research reveals that folding up seat feature was the least used feature. Therefore, the foldable rear seat was omitted to make way for comfier rear support (read: thicker padding).

Honda seems to be satisfied with the City, Honda even finally debut the City as a global car, making it available in parts of Europe, Brazil, China, India and even Australia. A far far far glorious story than the Japanese exclusive beginning and SE Asia specific model midlife.

So, is the City currently in its fifth generation or third generation? It’s up to you really, according to the name, the car is in its fifth generation. But discounting the two generation Japanese only Honda City and with its reboot as the SE Asia specific model, the car only reached its third generation. I guess for name sake we can say the car is in its fifth generation.

All in all, the City is a great car, a bit spotty here and there, but a great car nonetheless. For every generation there’s a fault somewhere, but Honda made it up in every successive generation. The third generation City is too small, but runs like hell. The fourth generation City is bloated but practical. The fifth generation City strikes it dead center. As the pinnacle of research and years of listening to the demand of the customer, it might just be the best Honda City to date, striking between balance, function and power.

http://www.honda.co.jp/HOT/ModelData/city/index.html

Refreshed CR-V Roars… With More Horsepower Off Course

It’s official, refreshed Honda CR-V sports new looks and meaner engine while… Get this… Improving mileage! Now that’s the Honda I love!

The most significant change off course, is straight visual, as Honda revised the front and rear bumper of the car. The changes are subtle, but you can really see a refreshed smile and more of an upscale look from the car than before. The bumper mesh has adopt hexagonal mesh, and gone are the two “bulge” that sandwich the license plate on the front. The rear end also made fresh with less pronounced bumper bulges. All in all, externally, the car receives a very good subtle change. Why mess with success some say, and CR-V is a hit all over the world. Inside, there’s not much to talk about, still looks like the ongoing non refreshed CR-V.

Image courtesy of Temple of VTEC, check the link below for bigger image.

European refreshed CR-V

The engine… Ah… The engine… The engine receives not only a bump in horsepower but also a bump in mileage. Previously, CR-V official EPA mileage bows down at 20 MPG City and 27 MPG Highway, now the number goes up 1 MPG across the board to 21/28 MPG, while… Get this… Producing more power. The outgoing engine produces 166 Bhp, now the engine produces 180 Bhp… WOWZA! In ASEAN the CR-V already uses 180PS engine, but remember, PS is 10% higher than HP. Therefore, accounting to PS power rating, the refreshed US bound CR-V produces somewhere between 182 PS.

The rest of the world including Japan will receive the styling upgrade in a not so distant future… In fact, Honda official Japan website has stated 17 of September as the official unveiling date of the car. Give or take a couple of months, we will have the refreshed CR-V in ASEAN.

I cometh late, but everyone still waits

Source:

Honda of Japan CR-V site

Honda of UK CR-V site

Temple of VTEC: Refreshed CR-V article

Freed + Hybrid = 2011!

You read that right, Honda is going to release a hybrid version of Freed in 2011! The news couldn’t be more official than official as current Honda President, Takanobu Ito himself told Nikkei on a newspaper interview.

Here’s an excerpt from Greencarcongress.com which covers the news.

The company intends to add a variety of hybrid models in the near future, including the CR-Z, a sporty hybrid, in February and a hybrid version of its Fit subcompact by the end of 2010. For the hybrid minivan expected as early as 2011, the company plans to launch a hybrid version of its mainstay Freed.

Fuel efficiency has been what matters most in hybrid vehicles, but what is required from now on is a balance among economy, fuel efficiency and price,” Ito said, expressing a desire to offer a wide variety of hybrids to customers. In developing electric cars, Honda must first meet California’s Zero Emission Vehicle regulation, which is considered the toughest in the world, Ito said.

Honda is going full force of introducing hybrid. Beginning with Insight 2.0, Honda is introducing (finally) hybrid technology to sub compacts which should make available these fuel sippers to the masses. Fit hybrid should be a no brainer as it will come in 2010 (an old news actually, I just didn’t have the time to post it), but the news about Freed being hybridized is welcoming news indeed. The Fit hybrid should cater to the newly weds, and the Freed hybrid caters to the new family.

How much fuel efficient the new Freed hybrid? Nobody knows… But according to Civic to Civic Hybrid, fuel efficiency increases up to 20% on highway (according to American Honda Motor EPA rating). Now, off course the price will also get an increase as well, but by how much? 30% should be warranted, and the cost of investment buying the hybrid version should be justified in just 3 years time (I randomly pick a long safe time).

A moment of palm to the face should be warranted because… Hey, Freed uses the same driving system as Fit, right down to the gearbox. So when Fit is going hybrid, why the same driving system shouldn’t fit into the Freed?

Honda also going to officially participate in the off again on again electric car battle inthe United States. Before, it was politic that kills Honda EV+ back in 2000, and now, with a swift slap from lady serendipity… It’s politic again that brings back the electric car war. The Governator has signed California zero emission vehicle regulation that warrants fat tax deduction for zero emission vehicle… Which are electric cars by the way.

So, the million dollar and two cent question is… Will we get it? (as in we + 2009 = South East Asia). Freed, again, as of today is still in high demand in Indonesia. Waiting list has reached November, and for some colors the waiting period has reached December. So, the rest of ASEAN should wait patiently until at the very least demand cools down before Honda starts to make the Freed available in your countries… Wait, that didn’t answer the question… Okay, will we get a hybrid Freed? It depends whether we get a hybrid Fit/Jazz or not. Producing a car is simple. You cast the engine, the chassis, and the sheet metal, assemble the parts and voila, a car. With a hybrid… Not so much.

Producing or even assembling a hybrid needs another level of experience which no SE Asia countries ever met. I’ve read complaint about Hyundai H-1 driver got a mild shock because of improper battery shielding, and that’s while he was opening the driver’s door … Now imagine a shock from a hybrid battery that holds more than 10 times the charge of a regular car battery. Thus, higher care and quality control must be put in place for a hybrid to be produced or even assembled. Off course, if Honda going to make the hybrid Freed affordable, economy in scale must be put in place… And that means having SE Asia a piece of the Freed hybrid.

We’ll see what happened  when the Fit hybrid is released… If we get a Jazz hybrid, then, you know that we will get a Freed hybrid.

Source:

Greencarcongress.com: Freed Hybrid in 2011

Electric Vehicles: Forward To The Past!

We can’t ignore it anymore, alternative fueled cars are in desperate needs in the not so distant future. With mother earth’s limited oil supply, we are going to  see a steep oil price increase again once the economy has recover. Honda and Toyota effort of introducing hybrid technology in cars are still wayward in term of reception by the consumers… Mostly because of the price, but mostly because it’s still uses fuel. Logically speaking, rather than spending a US$20K  (in the United States) to buy a Honda Insight, most people can just do purchasing a Fit for US$5K less, and use that US$5K to fuel the car for years to come.

Let’s look back home here in Indonesia. Honda Civic Hybrid and Toyota Prius can be had for… Prepare… Rp. 500 Million or roughly US$50K!!! That’s more than twice the price of Yaris or Fit/Jazz! The Yaris can be had for Rp. 200 Million (US$20K), and the Fit/Jazz can be had for 220 Million (US$22K)… Let’s all relax and make a very simple calculation here…

You want me? Pay me…

My SX4 consumes around 1 Liter for 9 Kilometer (21 US MPG) of full inner city driving. With fuel price (grade 92) is hovering steady at Rp. 6500 (US$ 0.65) per Liter, I pay around Rp 300.000,00 (US$30) per week, and totaling Rp. 1.2 Million (US$ 120) per month. Considering that fuel prices might gone up in the next months because of recovering world economy, I might just bloat the number to 1.5 or Rp 1.8 Million (US$ 180) per month. Then, considering people uses a car up to 4 years (or until their lease is up), I’m  going to multiply my monthly fuel costs by 4 years (given I work somewhere near my old office, even then, 1:9 is already astronomically low)… And voila! I have to pay around Rp 108 Million (US$1008). Do mind I got the car for Rp 169 Million (US$16900), combined with 4 years of fuel, my operational and initial cost of ownership of my car is a measly Rp 277 Million (US$27700), still far less than buying a hybrid in Indonesia. So it goes to say, it’s silly to buy a hybrid, at least in Indonesia. Most people didn’t know this, they just arrogantly purchase the car to say they help the environment or crap… They certainly help made Honda and Toyota wallet grew thicker along the process.

Cheaper to own and fuel for 4 years than a hybrid… Figure it out yourself

Still though, price aside, Hybrids do return insane amount of fuel economy. Then again, it still rely on fuel… So it cannot have the “car of the future” title. One of the most hype alternative energy nowadays is the revival of electric vehicles. You take a hybrid, and lop off the internal combustion engine. Make the car plugable to any existing electrical terminal and voila! Electric cars.

Chevrolet Volt leads the way in this field. Volt is the first full electric vehicle with the biggest twist in the story as any M. Night Shyamalan movies. It is through and through an electric vehicle… But wait! It also has an internal combustion engine… Err… What’s an internal combustion engine doing in an electric vehicle? Ha! Told you it has a twist. The internal combustion engine is not called an engine because it doesn’t the drive the car, instead, it’s a generator that burns fuel to recharge the battery that propels the Volt electric engine. Crazy science! Thus, the car’s battery can be recharged through traditional home outlet, or it can be recharge along the way with its fuel burning generator.

Chevrolet claims 230 MPG or 1 Liter for 97 Kilometers for the car using US EPA estimate. Obscenely fantastic figure. But then, the Internet and automotive in general came with an uproar for the claim. Frankly I find it misleading too. Volt electric engine uses electricity (d’oh) which doesn’t equal to EPA measurement which measures a car’s fuel consumption using fuel. When the Volt is fully charged, it uses no fuel whatsoever, until the battery charge is at 30%, then the generator kicks in and recharge the battery. With that said, Chevrolet should just mention the range of the car using fully charged battery and full tank not the fuel consumption. But still, Chevrolet has the right to call the 230 MPG claim because the car after all consumes fuel (if needed), at least not as preposterous as our next subject…

A smirk of truth

Enter Nissan Leaf, a fully deck through and through electric car. It doesn’t have a generator built in like the Volt… And you know what? Nissan claims 367 MPG or 1 Liter for 156 Kilometers… Atrociously misleading for me. The car is an electric car and doesn’t use any fuel whatsoever, so why does there’s a fuel consumption estimate there? It’s just wrong. Some people (probably a Nissan fan) argue that the claim is right. You take into account the KwH to charge the car, convert it into energy equivalent of fuel and other miscellaneous number crunching few knew. Bill Ford, executive chairman of Ford motor company even had a say on this fiasco. He say that the rating is meaningless and “this question devolves into madness”. Madness…

Blue madness

I call this whole Electric Vehicle phenomenon as silly. Because before the Internet was a hit in the late 90s, Honda, Toyota , Ford and even GM already had Electric Cars back in 1997 in the States. Honda EV+, Toyota Rav4-EV, Ford Ranger EV and GM EV1 was at that time the pinnacle of electric cars breakthrough. The cars wasn’t made public, rather it’s available as a special lease for very special people (and rich people) in America. The cost of lease ranged from US$399 to US$599 monthly, a very pricey lease indeed. However, like Nissan Leaf, the cars have an average of 100 Miles of range… And that’s 12 years ago (does Nissan improves anything except adding another set of door on the Leaf?).

This dinky car served as Honda advanced future projects

However, America was only graced by the might of electric cars for just a short while… Shorter still than even Honda lease plan of three years. Introduced in 1997, Honda EV+ was canceled by 1999 to be replaced by first generation Insight. But the true story behind it was far more darker.

According to HondaEV website, there’s political force in play shutting down all oil independent cars in production. Back then, the amount of battery needed to solely power electric cars are a lot, and there’s only one specific battery that is capable to power these cars, and it’s called Toyota-Panasonic EV95. General Motors, back in 1994 bought the patent rights to these batteries, and with single low blow in 2000 sell the rights to Texaco, that’s right A FREAKING OIL COMPANYGM sell alternative energy technology to a company that sells mainstream energy… Good work GM. The next move by Texaco for these oil free cars are to off course, SUE Toyota-Panasonic for the batteries, and Honda EV+ is floating around without a battery. A quote from HondaEV site couldn’t be more heartbreaking for electric car fans…

On Oct. 10, 2000, GM sold control of the patent rights needed for the EV-95 batteries to Texaco. On Oct. 16, Texaco announced it would merge into Chevron (Standard Oil). The next year, Chevron funded a lawsuit against Toyota-Panasonic et al., and the battery production line for the EV-95 batteries was halted.

Toyota paid $30,000,000 and received the right to make small batteries for the Prius, too small to plug in. Toyota shamefully made a virtue of its defeat by bragging that the Prius could not be plugged in. In reality, it was a great disgrace for Toyota to have to bow and scrape to Chevron’s unit that controlled the patents.

The HondaEV suddenly had no battery, no more could be made or sold.

Honda EV+ was left without any battery, and Toyota bows down to the pressure, making the Prius without any ability to be powered by the battery alone even after US$30 Million settlement. So folks, this is why your beloved Prius cannot operate in full battery mode, politics, not technological limit.

There’s also another barrier for entry on these electric cars, and that’s price. Back in 1997, Honda EV+ was unofficially priced at US$53900 (based on calculation of lease). Probably because it was a limited production model, as only 300 or so models produced. Still, it’s 1997 and US$53900 is nothing to sneezed at, times inflation, today the EV+ would costs around US$72000 (US Bureau of Labor Statistics inflation calculator). Now, Nissan hasn’t disclosed any price yet for its Leaf electric car… But do they have the technology to mass produce cheap electric technology? The thing is, battery and  high output reliable electric motors are expensive because both didn’t had its spot on the stage yet, so mass production (economy of scale) hasn’t been achieved. Electric cars will be expensive that’s for sure. At the very very very very very very very least, Nissan will have to heavily subsidize the car, and even so, personally I think Nissan would have to sell the car at US$30000… And that’s quite a lot.

Still though, does electric car is our future? If anything goes by… Yes, you can just plug it in at your home and you drive it the next morning… But it does have its own drawbacks. What do you think current electrical power plant uses as fuel? Hydro? Wind? Geo thermal? Anything renewable? Not quite. Developed countries power plants uses nuclear which produces toxic waste, and most developing countries still relies on old fashioned fossil fuel and coal. If your community is powered using renewable power source then it’s fine and dandy if you use electric cars. But what happens when your community is still powered using fossil fuel? You just hide behind all those fancy electric car gimmick and behind that all, you are still contributing to the use of fossil fuel. Nissan account this notion, that’s why they put MPG rating on the Leaf… But how they come it with the number is between Nissan, the fans, mother earth, the hippies and God.

One proposed alternative energy is to use Hydrogen, as Honda, Mercedes Benz and countless automotive company has proven with their concept cars, it is the fuel of the future. Yes, hydrogen is converted to electricity, making it somewhat an electric car allover again but still, it’s hydrogen. Any 5th grader would know, hydrogen is two part of molecule that forms water (H2O), that’s right folks, hydrogen can be extracted from water (and the last time I waddled through flooded local roads, we have lots of it). However, producing hydrogen is not easy, and in regular cases it takes more energy to produce usable amount of hydrogen through the act of electrolysis. Advance research is underway to extract hydrogen from water with the help of algae, but still usable amount extracted using this method is still a long way down.

Blue Efficiency? The car is green, get it, green because it emits water vapor exhaust…

Honda, Mercedes Benz and leading automotive makers has interest on hydrogen powered economy. Honda already even made FCX Clarity, world’s first dedicated-designed-commercially available (although only through lease) vehicle to be powered using hydrogen. Dedicated because they built a car specific to the engine, with fancy aerodynamics. Unlike Mercedes Benz ‘s F-Cell line of cars, which is an engine option on top of existing line of cars, primarily the A-Class and the B-Class (future dedicated model is coming based upon the B-Class though).

Honda FCX Clarity named 2009 Green World Car

So electric vehicles… Why forward to the past? Because technically, every known electric vehicle technology is just recycled or just improved upon from its predecessors. Nissan Leaf bull crap MPG comment aside, it has a range of 100 Miles, the same like Honda EV+ 12 years ago. The same technology can be found on FCX Clarity electric motor, taken straight from Honda EV+, although modified.

All in all, fancy terms and whatever, it’s nothing when real world driving experience falls short of the claims. Worse still, claims that are mind boggling to begin with. Nissan, stick to your GoTziRa.

Source:

Nissan unveils zero emission “Leaf”

Chevrolet “Volt” & Nissan “Leaf”  MPG claim under fire from Bill Ford

Honda EV+ complete history

US Bureau of Labor Statistic inflation calculator

Honda FCX Clarity Japanese website

Honda FCX Clarity named 2009 World Green Car